Andrew Cunningham wrote: > Thierry Koblentz writes: >> Regardless of the script used, without "unicode-bidi", one does get >> different results across browsers . >> In my example, FF keeps all lists LTR while IE shows the second one >> RTL
> and you you'll get different results again if you used Arabic > characters in the example. To create a test page in Latin script to > test RTL properties is problematic. For instance you need > "unicode-bidi", which wouldn't be necessary in a purely Arabic or > Hebrew page. Andrew, I'm not saying that different scripts won't add an additional level of embedding, I'm just saying that we *already* have a difference across browser using images *only* (no script) and *without* the use of "unicode-bidi". --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
