Tee G. Peng wrote:
Yes, it's for client's site. Not out of fame but perhaps marketing purpose. My dedication with extra hours of work for validating markups, css and section 508 (note, I don't just rely on validation tool but my eyes) on each page pay off, because I got a few gigs from companies and web design firms to do web standards compliant sites :). If I only put a link on the home page, it only mean the home page is validated, not other pages. Clients want their clients/ audiences know that each page is validated and section 508 compliant. Besides, this is a good way to promote web standards I think.
Personally, I'd say that a discreet mention in a site's "about" or "credits" section is more appropriate. *users* don't have a use for those links, and being sent to a technical site (such as a validator results page) won't make them any more clued up about standards.
IMHO, of course. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
