>> From D-Lib Magazine, v.12(11), 2006:
> http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson.html
>
> Excellent.
Indeed:
... The logical step [of MicroFormats to de-centralize behaviour
and appearance of tag-groups] - to add semantic in any
way - is complex but nesessary, because it guides to the ability
to make semantic definition dynamic/fluid and independent of
centralized and incestious groups of interest.
Semantics, and the nesessity of the demonstration of a specific
semantic has to be defined by the user, has to be definable by
the user - over time.
Me about semantics on WhatWG. It's only sad that folksonomy and taxonomy stand
in front of each other like armies, ready to fight to be 'right'.
A possible compromise (like we have a boot-strap of basic tags, the rest get's
invented on demand/need - our brain has a boot-stem for eating and sleeping, the
rest get's invented on demand/need) isn't in sight.
Ciao
Niels
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
