I thought that <p> Stood for paragraph Gerardo Cháirez
-----Mensaje original----- De: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Barney Carroll Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de Diciembre de 2006 03:50 a.m. Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Asunto: Re: [WSG] Semantics of P element (?) I somehow got the impression p stood for phrase... (?!) Mariusz Nowak wrote: > Anyway I wonder how it really should be treated.. (I'm not 100% positive > that my approach is right) or maybe both way are semantically valid to > treat p as I do and more strictly as you do.. > However due to lack of clear statement on it in w3c specs I doubt that > there is a clear answer for that. Regards, Barney Carroll ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ---- This message has been scanned by BitDefender and found to be clean. ---- This message has been scanned by BitDefender and found to be clean. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
