Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Designer wrote:
I don't want to start the argument all over again, Patrick, but I had
occasion to use SUP recently so I wondered how you'd do it instead?
I presume you'd define it in CSS with a smaller font and bottom
padding, but it seems a bit like overkill . . .?
Depends on the context (which is really the point: sub/sup, as they
currently stand, don't actually provide a proper context, but just
define how something should look). So, what occasion was it, exactly?
P
See:
http://colorantshistory.org/HistoryInternationalDyeIndustryRev1/HistoryInternationalDyestuffIndustryFirefox/dyestuffs.html
This is one (very long!) page I did for a colleague, in an effort to
convince him to use standards instead of Yahoo web builder. <scream>.
Sadly, he added some counter stuff on the end, which makes it fail
validation at around line 4300.
As it is a 'scientific' publication, I followed the normal scientific
conventions, so the references are all 'SUPped'. I considered (rightly
or wrongly!) that since <sup> does validate, it was OK in these
circumstances . . .
Bob
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
