What I wanted to say, is that for the navigational purposes, it should be used text rather than images with alt atribute that sould than be like alt="Image as a link that points to About company". Maybe I'm wrong, and there is nothing wrong with "image based navigation" that provides information about link itself thru alternative text. I am thinking like: "Why sould there be an alternative?"
When talking about other image elements, like site graphics and picturse (eg. gallery, banners, ads), than alt text is more than welcome (necesary)... Mihael On 1/9/07, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:13:20PM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote: > alt atribute is usefull... but for eg. navigational purposes, text > based link sould be provided to the user... It feels like > discriminating when providing alternatives to one of user groups... The alt text should be equivalent. If the user/browser can handle images then they should get the same information as if they can not. So where is the discrimination? The only difference is that people who are in a position to benefit from the graphical version can do so. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
-- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec s.p. ----------------------------------------------- tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec ----------------------------------------------- Toasted Web http://www.toastedweb.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
