Here here to nested declarations
On 1/12/07, Andrew Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christian Montoya wrote:
> By whacky you mean lovely, correct? Can I just go on the record for
> saying that I think the format is wonderful?
>
>> For something being used to format (X)HTML, I would have expected XML
or
>> something...
>
> Formatting it as XML sounds like a good idea for machines and would be
> nice as an alternative but I think the current format is much more
> convenient for writing CSS by hand.
>
I also like the format, XML isn't some magical file format that fixes
everything. In fact i'd say it's inappropriate for something like css
which has small file-size as one of it's key benefits.
I would have preferred CSS to support nesting of rules (example below)
but what we've got works pretty well.
#header {
blah: blah;
img { blah: blah; };
+ ul { blah: blah; };
> p { blah: blah; };
}
- Andrew Ingram
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
--
James
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
