Barney Carroll wrote:
I hate to sound like a fascist, but in terms of usability for sighted
users with compliant browsers (I know, why would we even care?), this is
the first time Google's eccentric attitude to standards has actually
impeded my use of any of their services.
The notion merits consideration: These incredibly 'inaccessible'
services are some of the most incredibly accessed on the web.
Sorry, I'm turning into a demagogue.
Of course I still believe it would be great if I could get less than
2000 validation warnings per page, and perhaps less than 10 sub-nested
tables in my Gmail app. Of course Google could be better - but still, I
/do/ care now that one of their products has become practically less
usable from a user perspective, as opposed to just abominable by theory.
Regards,
Barney
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
