Yea, I agree with your comment. Contents that is available through xml for flash improves performance. Also given the user a choice to switch to version of site is good idea to meet end users viewing experience.
Like I said, all still boils down to the project goal, target audience and your client. Sunday John Web Developer www.isslng.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob O'Rourke Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WSG] Art and accessibility - my opinion ;) Sunday John wrote: > Funny enough, website development depends on your site goal, target audience > and client's want. If your site demands that you use a flash (if it's a > major communication) then you have to use flash. > > Sunday John > Web Developer > www.isslng.com > > > > Not necessarily, check out what Dan Cederholm wrote about his work on MTV.com [1], they have a fully flash site that runs from a server-side generated xml file. Dan's role was to create XSLTs that transformed the same information into an accessible HTML version of the site so that users could chop and change as they saw fit. Now that's the way things should be done if an ENTIRE site is to be made in flash =] [1] http://www.simplebits.com/work/mtv/ I'm actually working on a browser-based multiplayer game with a friend of mine that will work in this way, hopefully it'll be the first truly accessible one too. Rob O ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
