I have confused myself :)
If the glyph for No. (as outlined in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No.) is used, should this be in an
abbreviation element to explain it? It is an abbreviation, isn't it??
What do screen-readers make of this particular glyph, if anything?
Or should it be kept as No., which is quite common, and wrapped into an
abbreviation element with a class of contraction, and a title of number?
Kat
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
