On 2/6/07, Jan Brasna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quicktime is that the files tend to be bulky, and
> there's no way they have the quality that a Flash video file will.
That's not precisely true, the Sorenson and H.24(4|3) are pretty much
similar in effectiveness to VP6 (and some of the codecs are even shared
among these containers). All depends on processing settings.
Well if you are going to have a mixed bag of results depending on what
codecs your users have, then that should be a big warning sign right
there. The fact that *some* users get a poor experience with Quicktime
content is exactly why Sarah should go with Flash.
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net .. designtocss.com
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
