"It's a nightmare to maintain, for developers and even for you" -> Senior web developer What would you me to reply ? -> I am a junior web developer, not such experience. I think I will get troubles again if I restart to tell people reconsidering methods of work :\

--
Wcube . eQuesto
Pierre-Henri LAVIGNE
Web developer xhtml - css
33, rue des Jeûneurs - FR 75002 Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +33(0)1 42 47 83 83
www.wcube.fr / www.equesto.fr




James Thomson wrote:
Why would you not just use conditional stylesheets? They're well supported
and mean that your core css will validate perfectly.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pierre-Henri Lavigne
Sent: 10 February 2007 17:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WSG] "Avoid non valid css hacks"

Ok at my work I joined last october they used to work with ie hacks such as _

In their specifications, they are releasing only valid html code and not css, and I am trying to release valid css stylesheets too, (Boum) I still used tantek hack for example with voice-family. And for various reasons, they don't like it. For maintaining they don't want to use ie conditional stylesheets for example and want everything in one stylesheet.

So everyone think about it, decided to upgrade it progressivly to try finding new stuffs.

First initiative came from a colleague who suggest for width and height properties :
width: 980px !important; /* standard loving browser */
width: 952px; /* IE5 */
width /**/ : /**/ 962px; /* IE6 */

What do you think about it ? Is it a method already used on the web ?

My other question is different and was about the selector >. I am using html>body #container for example. On the source from webstandardsawards.com they are using body>#container. I suppose it is ok 'cause IE 6 won't understand it, but was it tested in depth ?

Cheers,

--
Wcube . eQuesto
Pierre-Henri LAVIGNE
Web developer xhtml - css
33, rue des Jeûneurs - FR 75002 Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +33(0)1 42 47 83 83
www.wcube.fr / www.equesto.fr



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to