On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > If Maildir/ is to be interpreted as INBOX,
Is there any suggestion that this will not be the case? -- Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] Maildir++ Caskey L. Dickson
- Re: [bincimap] Maildir++ Lee Daniel Crocker
- [bincimap] INBOX.foo.bar (was Re: Maildir++) Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] INBOX.foo.bar (was Re: Maildir+... Caskey Dickson
- Re: [bincimap] Maildir++ Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] Maildir++ Andreas Aardal Hanssen
- [bincimap] Treatment of ./.INBOX (was Re: Mail... Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] Treatment of ./.INBOX (was Re: ... Andreas Aardal Hanssen
- Re: [bincimap] Treatment of ./.INBOX (was Re: ... Lee Daniel Crocker
- Re: [bincimap] Treatment of ./.INBOX (was Re: ... Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] Interpretation of Maildir/ (was... Charlie Brady
- Re: [bincimap] Interpretation of Maildir/ (was... Andreas Aardal Hanssen
- Re: [bincimap] Treatment of ./.INBOX (was Re: ... Charlie Brady
- [bincimap] Consistency and Courier-IMAP (was R... Charlie Brady
