On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Charlie Brady wrote: >On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >> > Maildir++ reads like it was designed hand-in-hand with a particular IMAP >> > implementation in mind: i.e., it's not an extension to Maildir which >> > happens to have a side effect of improving IMAP support. I think it >> > places unnecessary restrictions on your IMAP server. >> > How does Maildir++ benefit BincIMAP? >> For our current situation, Maildir++ provides a unique mapping from IMAP >> mailboxes to file system directories and back again. >Only sort of, as we have discussed earlier.
Not sort of. An exact mapping. What we discussed earlier is wether or not the mapping is optimal from an administrator/user's point of view. For example -> INBOX.work maps directly to the Maildir/.work directory Maildir/.work/ maps back to INBOX.work, no ambiguity. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | Nil desperandum
