[Casky, please configure your mailer to fold long lines.] On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Caskey Dickson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:02:02AM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > > Wouldn't "directory tree" be an adequate term? > > No, directory tree isn't adequate because while it is a directory tree > (in the ISA sense), there is considerable specific structure that > MUST/MAY/SHOULD be present and has defined interpretation and meaning > (at least meaning that is in the process of being defined). ... > I'm fine with any name, but we will need a term to describe this > specific structure that is being contemplated. Will a name help? What we need is documentation which defines how a directory tree will be exported by bincimap, and conversely, how IMAP transactions will create and modify that directory tree. To my mind, the semantics will be specific to bincimap's implementation. The directory structure itself doesn't strike me as an interesting entity, without the semantics of bincimap's IMAP implementation bound to it. -- Charlie
