On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Andersen wrote:
>Hi,
>I'm running Binc IMAP in conjunction with the IMP webmail software and i was 
>wondering if anyone out there could help me with a small problem i'm having. 
>Imp has quota support of sorts built in so that users can see how much space 
>is free, but i can't work out how to get this to work with Binc... There are 
>examples provided for Courier and Cyrus, which look fairly straight forward, 
>so i figure Binc couldn't be too different. Does binc actually have quota 
>support or should i just give up on this feature for the time being?
>The code i'm trying at the moment is 
>$quota = imap_get_quota ($stream, 'INBOX');
>which seems the most logical way i can think of, given that i'm using the 
>default setup which means everything is a subfolder of inbox. Could anyone 
>shed some light on this situation for me?

Yes :-). Binc IMAP does not support QUOTA, which is an extension to the
IMAP protocol.

The reason for not supporting this and many other extensions, which I
assume is something several others also wonder about, is that I want the
mail "vanilla" server to be rock solid with regards to design and
implementation. I also want it to be easy to modify the source and build
extensions for third parties. I want Binc to reach a stable state before 
we start adding, extending, etc.. At the point where Binc in its vanilla 
state is good enough, we will move out of beta development, and release 
1.2.0. Extension and feature enhancement will continue in 1.3.0, and only 
bugfixing will continue in 1.2.x.

Binc has been undergoing some heavy reengineering through the last few
releases, and the 1.1.9 release will be even better than the ones before
it. But for those of you who need extensions and don't bother too much
about stability, Dovecot is an alternative server.

But check out the archives on bug history first..

Andy :-)

-- 
Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg
Author of Binc IMAP    | "It is better not to do something
                       |  than to do it poorly."

Reply via email to