Hi, Stefano, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Stefano Rivera wrote: >Evening all, >I downloaded, patched, and compiled Binc 1.1.9 at home, this weekend, >and finally made the switch to IMAPdir. Seems to behave well, nice one >guys!
Great - and you'll probably like 1.2.0b1 better, because all known bugs after the refactoring release 1.1.9 have been fixed. :-) >Well, that's the good news. Bad news: I saw a few zombie bincimap >processes, where the IMAP client (mozilla) was long since closed, but I'm hoping if you see this problem again, that you can find more information. I know this was a problem with early versions of Binc but I haven't seen them for a while. >Also, as I stated in my subject, I see that we still have bad handling >of rfc822 messages by the Binc Mozilla combination unless the >workaround is used (but the workanound make scanning folders with >large messages very slow...) >Andreas, is this purely a Mozilla problem? I will not assume it is. But I will study the problem more and see what I can come up with. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something | than to do it poorly."
