On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > No, LIST output and the contents of the subscribed file are not related in > this sense. If I subscribe to "thisfolderdoesnotexist" when it doesn't > exist, then it doesn't make sense for Binc to display it in LIST, which > lists the depository's actual contents.
Shouldn't they be considered related when it's a single folder on disk? I.e. if the client believes that a folder is called "/folder" and subscribes to it, shouldn't Binc (after canonicalizing interally) play along and also show the folder named the same way? I realize this isn't very clean, but I understand why clients become confused when they ask for one thing and receive another. (Because Binc canonicalizes in one place, but not the other.) //Peter
