Security at the expense of usability comes at the expense of security.

Many users will write down passwords that must meet the requirements you 
described.  There is no way that is not going to happen.

As pointed out earlier, the first four requirements are sound and logical. 
 The others will cause ongoing problems and probably result in reduced 
security because they are so unfriendly to humans.

Another password creation/memory trick to teach users is to say a song 
lyric or famous quote/sentence in their head and use the first letter of 
each word, mixing in caps and numbers if needed.

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" = Iwtb0tIwtw0t
"I saw her today at the reception, a glass of wine in her hand" = 
IshtatragOwihh

Easy to remember and reasonably complex.  But it gets annoying for long 
passwords and would be better, and more secure, just to type a sentence, 
if the system allows that.

Maybe roll out a required password manager program for everyone?  There 
are some that are centrally controllable.

-- Mark



From:   Sean Martin <seanmarti...@gmail.com>
To:     "ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com" <ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com>
Date:   04/27/2016 05:13 PM
Subject:        Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Password expiring debate on patch 
management
Sent by:        <listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com>



Great timing for this thread.

A recently updated password policy has sparked some debate at %dayjob%. It 
contains some of the expected requirements:

- unique per account
- varying length requirements based on account type (domain user, 
administrative user, etc.)
- don't include userID or personal information (birthday, phone number, 
SS#, etc.)
- standard complexity requirements (uppercase/lowercase/numerical/special)

...then some additional requirements, which are raising some eyebrows:

- must not contain a dictionary word
- must not contain repetitive or sequential characters
- must not be derived from publicly searchable internet or social media 
information (favorite sports team, names of friends or family, schools, 
restaurants, etc.)

While I understand the intent, my opinion is that no typical end-user is 
going to truly understand what these requirements mean, or will simply 
find them too difficult to comply with. Our current expiration policy is 
90 days. I believe the end users would rather deal with more frequent 
password changes than have to adhere to the above stated policy. 

Interested in other opinions....

- Sean

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks.  100% true story + federal investigation.  State lines were 
crossed, and millions of dollars were at stake.

--
Espi
 

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Dave Lum <l...@ochin.org> wrote:
That?s a perfect example Michael.
 
Or, let?s say I am in IT at Target, maybe later I move into IT at an HVAC 
company that has VPN access to Target (IT guys working at companies that 
do business with their former employers? Never happens right?). Maybe my 
PC at the HVAC place get compromised and since Target never disabled my 
account and I use the same password at %newjob% as I did %oldjob%, a 
simple hop over VPN now leverages the access I had at Target?
 
Except what actually happened with Target was more *harder* than what I 
described above.
 
IMO any place that doesn?t require a password expiration of any kind is 
likely (exceptions to this, sure) the same place that doesn?t have a 
process for disabling all the access former employees have.
 
Dave
 
From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:31 PM
To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Password expiring debate on patch management
 
1.      Old admin knows many management passwords
2.      Old admin goes to work for competitor
3.      Company and competitor are up for same contracts
4.      Old admin remotes into company to look at emails and presentation 
materials
5.      Competitor starts taking business from company by usurping sales 
pitches in very specific ways
6.      I get hired 2+ years after old admin in question
7.      I review remote logs to establish behavioral patterns
8.      I see odd logon behavior and trace repetitive IPs
9.      I trace IPs to competitor as well as old admin specifically
 
I am Jacks complete lack of surprise when management doesnt change their 
password and uses the same passwords for many things.
 
 

--
Espi
 
 
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Kennedy, Jim <
kennedy...@elyriaschools.org> wrote:
 
"Even six months is far better than never" 
 
Why?
 

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com [listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] on 
behalf of Dave Lum [l...@ochin.org]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 6:58 PM
To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Password expiring debate on patch management
Anyone see the debate on the Patch management list, driven by this: 
https://www.cesg.gov.uk/articles/problems-forcing-regular-password-expiry
 
I don?t even know how it?s a debate other than the desired frequency (no 
one-size-fits-all on that IMO). Even six months is far better than never. 
With expiring passwords you at bare minimum mitigate employee?s that 
leave.
 
David Lum
Systems Administrator III
P: 503.943.2500
E: l...@ochin.org
A: 1881 SW Naito Parkway, Portland, OR 97201 

 www.ochin.org 

 
 
 
 
 
Attention: Information contained in this message and or attachments is 
intended only for the recipient(s) named above and may contain 
confidential and or privileged material that is protected under State or 
Federal law. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or action taken on it is prohibited. If you believe 
you have received this email in error, please contact the sender with a 
copy to complia...@ochin.org, delete this email and destroy all copies. 
 
Attention: Information contained in this message and or attachments is 
intended only for the recipient(s) named above and may contain 
confidential and or privileged material that is protected under State or 
Federal law. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or action taken on it is prohibited. If you believe 
you have received this email in error, please contact the sender with a 
copy to complia...@ochin.org, delete this email and destroy all copies. 




Reply via email to