What happens if you edit the host file and remove the entry for ::1 on the 
server that is having the issue?

Mike


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Michael Leone
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 10:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NTSysADM] DFSDIAG warnings - IP with conflicting site associations

I am about to demote another Win2008 R2 DC, so I ran "dfsdiag /testdcs" first. 
And on this server, it starts to validate the site associations of this server. 
And it says:

The server has IP address with conflicting site associations.

Host IP address                         Subnet-SiteMapping in AD
::1                                                No mapping exists


Now, isn't ::1 the IPv6 equivalent of 127.0.0.1? I'm not using IPv6, and in 
fact it is unchecked in the network connection properties. And I don't see this 
error when I do that command on the 2 other servers (which also don't have 
IPv6).

I'm guessing that it thinks I need a subnet in Sites and Services, but I don't 
know why (or where) it's finding that ::1 at all ... Nor why the 2 other 
servers in this same site are *not* showing this error, even when querying the 
problematical server. There's just the 1 NIC, and I am not using a VPN (which 
might be assigning an IP).

Web searches have been less than fruitful ... Event log of this server shows 
nothing about DFS warnings or errors.

I don't want to create an IPv6 subnet, as I don't plan on using IPv6. Is it 
safe to just ignore this? (most especially since I am about to demote it, and 
since there are no other DFS namespaces besides Domain System Volume, and the 2 
other servers don't show the error)

ADDENDUM: now DFSDIAG /testreferral is telling me there are stale entries and 
to restart the service on all DCs. Yet that same command does *not* show stale 
entries on the other DCs in the domain ...

<SIGH>

Oh, well. It's still just the test domain, I will restart all 3 DCs, and do 
something else for a few minutes while they come back up and hopefully sync ...



Reply via email to