MS15-034 Exploit Information from Offensive Security.

http://www.r00tsec.com/2015/04/resource-for-ms15-034-httpsys-exploit.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+r00tsecblog+%28Computer+Security+Blog%29

Ed


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Ed Ziots <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hate.to hijack a thread but wanted you to know that ms15-034 has exploit
> code out.for it and could be exploited in the wild soo.
>
> Ed
> On Apr 15, 2015 10:58 AM, "Michael Leone" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am about to demote another Win2008 R2 DC, so I ran "dfsdiag /testdcs"
>> first. And on this server, it starts to validate the site associations of
>> this server. And it says:
>>
>> The server has IP address with conflicting site associations.
>>
>> Host IP address                         Subnet-SiteMapping in AD
>> ::1                                                No mapping exists
>>
>>
>> Now, isn't ::1 the IPv6 equivalent of 127.0.0.1? I'm not using IPv6, and
>> in fact it is unchecked in the network connection properties. And I don't
>> see this error when I do that command on the 2 other servers (which also
>> don't have IPv6).
>>
>> I'm guessing that it thinks I need a subnet in Sites and Services, but I
>> don't know why (or where) it's finding that ::1 at all ... Nor why the 2
>> other servers in this same site are *not* showing this error, even when
>> querying the problematical server. There's just the 1 NIC, and I am not
>> using a VPN (which might be assigning an IP).
>>
>> Web searches have been less than fruitful ... Event log of this server
>> shows nothing about DFS warnings or errors.
>>
>> I don't want to create an IPv6 subnet, as I don't plan on using IPv6. Is
>> it safe to just ignore this? (most especially since I am about to demote
>> it, and since there are no other DFS namespaces besides Domain System
>> Volume, and the 2 other servers don't show the error)
>>
>> ADDENDUM: now DFSDIAG /testreferral is telling me there are stale entries
>> and to restart the service on all DCs. Yet that same command does *not*
>> show stale entries on the other DCs in the domain ...
>>
>> <SIGH>
>>
>> Oh, well. It's still just the test domain, I will restart all 3 DCs, and
>> do something else for a few minutes while they come back up and hopefully
>> sync ...
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to