I would have to disagree with you on that.
Branch Cache does indeed work well and performs as expected. There are certainly some pieces where OneSite and Nomad offer functionality that is plain not provided within Branch Cache but generally with Branch Cache you configure it once on the devices and it plain works. While Branch Cache Regards “intensive development” Branch Cache was introduced in Windows VISTA and has been included and supported in the Windows family ever since. The developers have done a good, sound job and the feature is largely without issue. A reasonable and responsible recommendation is to evaluate products alongside other solutions and to propose the solution that best meets your customer’s budget and needs. FWIW I have deployed a Branch Cache solution to an estate with 1400 sites globally and I presently support a CM2012R2 estate of 22,000 devices running almost exclusively on Branch Cache and an organisation considerably larger than this with OneSite. Perhaps you’d like to point out where you feel Branch Cache is inferior and we can then approach matters constructively Jason From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of elsalvoz Sent: 28 May 2015 14:27 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache It doesn't work well or as advertised that's why many do not use it, the return is not worth the headache. This I've heard from colleagues and this list since I haven't tried it personally in production. The recommendation is to use 3rd party tools provider like 1e or adaptiva that have done intensive development on their tools. Cesar A On May 28, 2015 6:19 AM, "David Jones" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: There is not a whole lot written about this. Is anyone here using it? Your thoughts? Dave
