Yeah, not surprisingly they came up with an answer that theirs was better…
We wrote an updated version of that, but haven’t released that yet… //A From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: den 28 maj 2015 16:06 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache So have you ACTUALLY used Branch Cache or are you just listening to what others tell you? 1e wrote a very good comparison white paper between Branch Cache and Nomad, concluding of course that their product was “better” but that Branch Cache was a good solution. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of elsalvoz Sent: 28 May 2015 15:01 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache It would be a good poll to take. Maybe I haven't talked to correct people. Cesar A On May 28, 2015 6:49 AM, "Jason Sandys" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The 2Pint guys will vehemently disagree with you on this. BranchCache can work quite well and I’m sure they will share with you many success stories (offline of course). I also know of a handful including a large 35,000 seat energy company. J From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of elsalvoz Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 8:27 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache It doesn't work well or as advertised that's why many do not use it, the return is not worth the headache. This I've heard from colleagues and this list since I haven't tried it personally in production. The recommendation is to use 3rd party tools provider like 1e or adaptiva that have done intensive development on their tools. Cesar A On May 28, 2015 6:19 AM, "David Jones" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: There is not a whole lot written about this. Is anyone here using it? Your thoughts? Dave
