And if you’re on the BriForum attendee list, later this week you should be able 
to hear my north-eastern tones in full when my session is posted.

If you didn’t attend, then you might get to hear them globally in about six 
months or so :-0

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Webster
Sent: 02 June 2015 21:09
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

When I spoke at Briforum London a couple of years ago, I had to run some of my 
session remarks by James. I am glad I did as some of the things we say in 
American English can be very offensive and very non PC in England. Plus, James 
had to school me on British slang.

If you ever meet James, make sure you have your listening ears on. But you 
still may not be able to understand a word he says even though he supposedly 
speaks “English”. ☺

Thanks


Webster

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:59 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Done. I had to look up pants.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rankin, James R
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 3:52 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Knock yourself out, I'm short on blog visitors since doing BriForum (and yes, 
you'd be pants if you didn't)
-------

James Rankin | Director | TaloSys | 07809668579
Sent from my Blackberry
________________________________
From: "Kennedy, Jim" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sender: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:06:40 +0100
To: 
'[email protected]'<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
ReplyTo: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Mind if I tweet this out?

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Rankin
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 2:35 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

OK, quick and dirty run-down, but I’m sure you can all get the gist of it 
(hopefully!)

http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/fslogix-first-look-1-managing-legacy-or.html


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: 02 June 2015 17:38
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Yes, please put up the link here when done.
Kurt

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Rankin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I shall endeavour to finish this as soon as possible then!

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
Sent: 02 June 2015 16:12
To: '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Me too!

-Paul

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Martin
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:07 AM

To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Definitely interested.

- Sean

On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:08 AM, James Rankin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What you need is FSLogix Java Rules Manager, only allow the vulnerable Java 
version to be seen when a specific URL is visited, otherwise – it’s invisible 
to the user and OS, and the latest version is used.

I’m writing an article up on this today, if anyone’s interested in Java version 
management (on a sysadmin list, who isn’t?)

☺


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: 02 June 2015 14:51
To: '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

Update Java?  That’s just crazy talk.  We’re still at 7u51, with no roadmap in 
place to go any higher.  Not my choice, btw, it is development issues with 
Oracle.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Ziots
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker


Nice.strategy

Ed
On May 29, 2015 9:31 AM, "Robert Strong" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ensure you have the latest patches installed for Java and Flash. Exploit kits 
like Angler, Nuclear and Magnitude are starting to distribute Ransomware more 
frequently via drive-by download attacks and malicious advertisements on common 
websites.

We’ve had several ransomware incidents in the last few months all due to 
unpatched systems. Host based detection is limited at best, but one thing I 
have noticed in all incidents seen is that the malware typically uses 
hxxp://ipinfo.io/ip<http://ipinfo.io/ip> to determine its public facing IP 
address.

We have created correlation rules that detect users going to this domain via 
our McAfee ESM SIEM, we then have an alarm that fires when that correlation 
rule is seen and we can automatically apply an ePO tag to enforce a policy that 
severely ‘disables’ the system (no R/W to network shares, restricted HTTP/HTTPS 
going out). Our alarm also e-mails out some key characteristics about the 
infected machine for easy identification by our IT Service Desk team.

Ransomware isn’t going away and it’s going to get worse. We’ve been able to 
detect these IoC’s and have the issue remediated in under 7 minutes.

Cheers,

Rob Strong
Information Security Specialist
Equitable Life of Canada



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:17 PM
To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

That's mine today.
What variant was yours

Sent from my iPhone

On May 28, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We had that the other day.  The files are getting encrypted, but the extensions 
are not getting changed.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 8:37 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cryptlocker

The text files created should indicate the affected user with the Owner 
attribute, no?


On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM, David McSpadden 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am pretty sure I have pc with this on it in my network.
I have ran scans on workstations.
I still do not see it but I have the tell tale signs.
The HELP_DECRYPT files in network folders.
The word and excel files not being able to be opened etc.
How do I remove something that Trend is not seeing?
Nor Windows Endpoint protection?


David McSpadden
Systems Administrator
Indiana Members Credit Union
P: 317.554.8190<tel:317.554.8190> | F: 317.554.8106<tel:317.554.8106>
[Description: imcu email icon]<http://imcu.com/>  
<image002.jpg><https://www.facebook.com/IndianaMembersCU>  [Description: 
twitter email icon] <https://twitter.com/IndMembersCU>

<image003.jpg>
<image004.png>


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members 
Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of 
the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have 
received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this 
message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, 
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.


Please consider the environment before printing this email.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Without the use of secure encryption, the Internet is not a 
secure medium and privacy cannot be ensured. Internet e-mail is vulnerable to 
interception, misuse and forging. Equitable cannot ensure the privacy and 
authenticity of any information sent by way of the public Internet. Equitable 
will not be responsible for any damages you may incur if you communicate 
confidential and personal information to us over the Internet or if we 
communicate such information to you at your request. This e-mail and any 
attachments are confidential, may be covered by legal professional privilege or 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and are intended for the addressee 
only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to and must 
not disclose, copy, distribute or retain any or part of this e-mail and any 
attachments without written permission of The Equitable Life Insurance Company 
of Canada.

Reply via email to