Once you install the latest ConfigMgr service packs, or v.Next, the "Operating 
System Installers" are called OS upgrade packages, since that's the only case 
where they need to be used: for performing an in-place upgrade to a new OS 
(Windows 10).

Thanks,
-Michael

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 3:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim

Correct, you no longer need to use the Operating System Installers, 
particularly for Win7 and later.  It does make life a bit easier :)

-Phil



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 5:27 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim

Hmm.  I didn't know it was possible to import and use the Install.wim in the 
build and capture instead of running Windows setup.  I think that got added in 
SP1 of 2012 and I missed it. (old dog, meet new tricks)  So there's no reason 
to have "Operating System Installers" for Win7+ and just dump everything in the 
"OS Images" instead.   There is really no need to run the "setup" method with 
Windows 7 anymore?

Oh, well.  Too late for now...

I am trying out this method , which updates the Intall.wim which is then 
imported and runs still as an Windows Setup in Build & Capture
https://www.raymond.cc/blog/create-an-integrated-up-to-date-windows-7-install-disc/


Thanks for the suggestions.


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim

This is what I do also. I actually inject a handful of others things manually 
like 2775511 and IE11 before I even import it into ConfigMgr. Then I use 
offline updates and then use this updated WIM during a B&C to add other things 
as well. Note that I add the updates (like 2775511) offline first because it 
superseded many updates as does adding IE11 and thus prevents them from having 
to be injected by the offline updates process.

J

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 2:18 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim

Why not import install.wim as an Operating System Image and use Scheduled 
Updates to slipstream updates into the base media?  I do it all the time; it 
was my primary workaround for the multi-reboot patch issue.

-Phil

_________________________________________________________________
Phil Schwan | Technical Architect, Enterprise Windows Services
Microsoft VTSP ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Project Leadership Associates | 2000 Town Center, Suite 1900, Southfield, MI 
48075
Lync: 312.756.1626  Mobile: 419.262.5133
www.projectleadership.net<http://www.projectleadership.net/> 
[linkedin_logo-19x20] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/philschwan> 
[Twitter-Logo1-20x20] <https://twitter.com/philschwan>  [wordpress-logo3] 
<http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/author/philschwan>
[Description: Description: Description: Arrow email]Lead with Strategy. 
Leverage Technology. Deliver Results.




From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 2:10 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim

I think we are talking about two different things.

I am asking about patching the install.wim file that comes on the Windows 7 x64 
DVD.  I think you are talking about injecting patches into your captured WIM - 
using offline servicing.
SCCM will not apply patches to install.wim images loaded into the "Operating 
System Installers" - only the captured images in "Operating System Images"  
Yes, I too inject patches into the Image WIM between Build and Capture 
refreshes.

The problem I am trying to solve is the 4-6 hour build and capture time that is 
done to create the patched hybrid image that is then used for client 
deployment.  I would like to reduce the time it takes and increase the 
reliability of the Build and Capture task sequence.  It is failing about 25% of 
the time and has ~ 190 post SP1 patches to apply and takes many hours to run.


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Boyles, Peter J {BIS}
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Patching install.wim


I use patch injection to keep WIMs updated and it works great.  Understand that 
some patches cannot be installed in offline mode.  It is a balancing act 
between WIM size buildup and patches that cannot be installed offline that 
determine when to create a new WIM for deployment.


Peter Boyles
BIS Engineering Analyst
PepsiCo Inc. | Global End User Services | GEUS Deploy

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 12:40 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] Patching install.wim

I am thinking of updating my install.wim by slipstreaming patches into it.   I 
want to do this to reduce the number of patches that are required to be 
installed during my build and capture task sequence.

Is this a good/bad/safe idea?

http://scug.be/sccm/2011/07/27/windows-7-osd-deployment-sccm-or-mdt-and-starting-with-a-patched-media-more-secure-amp-saves-time/
or
http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrdogs/archive/2012/02/15/applying-windows-updates-to-a-base-wim-using-dism-and-powershell.aspx
or
http://happysccm.com/optimize-the-build-and-capture-time-and-size-sccm-build/


(I am not interested in using light touch for build and capture)



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

Reply via email to