Has this worked for you?   We just set ours for 30 mins a few days ago and
have not seen any better results. The machines are still taking several
hours to report back.
[image: Inline image 1]

Thank you,

Amy





Thank you,

Amy Zitta
ITS | 314-977-2117

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Roland Janus <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Even better  J
>
>
>
> I probably go shorter then you, have only 1000 clients.
>
>
>
> I thought it must be something like this, but does that also apply to
> after OSD?
>
> Would that make any sense?
>
>
>
> One client is not reporting at all, but I can live with that. Will be
> reinstalled anyway
>
>
>
> Thanks, Roland
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sherry Kissinger
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015 13:43
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] hardware inventory not triggered on new client
> installation
>
>
>
> and... blogged it.
>
>
> http://www.mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger/405-configmgr-2012-inventory-max-random-delay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 6:22 AM, Sherry Kissinger <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> There's something called "Inventory Max Random Delay", which is a sorta
> kinda hidden setting.  You can adjust it, just not via the console.  My
> understanding of what it is for is to randomize when, for example, someone
> uses client push to say... their entire, newly discovered, every single
> system discovered in AD.  It's so that there isn't a flood of full
> inventory within 10 minutes in those cases.  Of course, if you're a mature
> installation--it's unlikely that you'll have that.  By default it is 240
> minutes (4 hours)--we've changed ours to 60.  To see what it is set to,
> here's the SQL you'd run in SQL Server Management Studio against your
> cm_sitecode database, just to see what yours it set at: (view only, it
> changes nothing.)  Each primary will have it set. (If you are unlucky to
> have a CAS, it will have it as well; but a CAS has no clients so it's not
> really relevant; but for consistency may want to change it)
>
>
>
> SELECT SD.SiteCode, SCC.ClientComponentName, SCP.Name, SCP.Value1,
> SCP.Value2, SCP.Value3 FROM SC_ClientComponent SCC
>
> JOIN SC_SiteDefinition SD ON SD.SiteNumber = SCC.SiteNumber
>
> JOIN SC_ClientComponent_Property SCP ON SCP.ClientComponentID = SCC.ID
> <http://scc.id/>
>
> WHERE SCP.Name like '%Inventory Max Random Delay%'
>
>
>
> To adjust the Max Random Delay, you run the attached vbscript, after
> modifying the SiteCode to match the one you are changing
>
>
>
> You run it as cscript whatever.vbs YourPrimaryServerName The3CharSiteCode
> (after changing the desiredvalue and sitecode inside).  If you have
> multiple primaries, you need to run it on each one--it's per sitecode.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =============================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Take a look at inventoryagent.log.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From: *Roland Janus [[email protected]]
> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 23, 2015 05:43 AM Eastern Standard Time
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Subject: *[mssms] hardware inventory not triggered on new client
> installation
>
> I have that same issue on *two* 2012 R2 SP1 installations and never
> noticed that before:
>
>
>
> The schedule for hw inv is set to once a day (regular, not custom).
>
> When installing a system using OSD the ddr is sent right away, but
> hardware inventory isn’t (software inv is empty).
>
> The action is available, so it knows that it needs to or at least that it
> is enabled, I can trigger it manually and it works fine then but unless I
> trigger it manually it just sits there .
>
>
>
> The same happens when installing the client on existing machines. Not on
> all of them but some. (given they are a mess and will be refreshed later on)
>
> But as it seems to have the policy, why isn’t it triggering it right after
> the agent install or OSD?
>
>
>
> I’ve never noticed that behavior on previous versions (I think)
>
>
>
> -R
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:04 AM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to