Do you think it is possible to have a working subnet that has 5000 clients? I would think the broadcast traffic alone from 5K clients would chew up a large percent of the network bandwidth. That’s not an SCCM problem, but on the other hand you are spending time engineering the SCCM stuff to handle a network topology that I don’t think will work. I am not a network engineer, so honestly I don’t know what I am talking about. But it sounds unfeasible to me.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] [sccm 2012] multiple sup for a primary For the MPs, that's now available with that AllowedMPs regkey (if you have that version or higher of CM12 & CU). For SUPs... you could still use this: http://www.smsmarshall.com/Pages/LocationAware.aspx which was written before the update for CM12 which allowed for the MP preference to be set. On Thursday, July 2, 2015 9:39 AM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Not sure about the rest but you can control the MP that clients talk to, but there are a few caveats. 2012 R2 CU3 or higher: Use the AllowedMPs reg key http://blogs.technet.com/b/jchalfant/archive/2014/09/22/management-point-affinity-added-in-configmgr-2012-r2-cu3.aspx 2012 R2 SP1 or higher: Use the MP boundaries http://www.systemcenterdudes.com/sccm-2012-r2-sp1-new-features/ Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Sihassen Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:15 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] [sccm 2012] multiple sup for a primary Hi everyone, I have a question about implementing several SUP attached to the same primary server. The goal would be to avoid clients to connect to a random SUP and avoid loading the network link between a subnet and the Datacenter. Is it possible to force a client to connect to a specific management point? A secondary server would be the easiest option but I dislike this option and we'll probably get more than 5k client on this subnet by the end of the year which would imply getting another secondary server. Thanks in advance. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. ________________________________ Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. ________________________________
