nope, it's not fixed in this CU

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:33 PM, John Aubrey <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Does anyone know if this issue has been fixed in CU1?  It doesn’t appear
> to be.  I can only find fixes for Win10 driver issues.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Sandys
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 9:07 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> It still works fine, just not very quickly.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Andreas Hammarskjöld
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 2:35 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> I would say that a 12GB driver package is pretty broken Jason! J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Sandys
> *Sent:* den 10 juli 2015 21:23
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Yes, it happens every time for a specific set of drivers. To my knowledge,
> it’s based on the construction of the inf file from the vendor thus there
> are some drivers unaffected by this. It’s not broken per se, just causes
> extra time when downloading the driver package during OSD and some space
> wastage in the source files. How much depends upon the inf file itself and
> how many times files are referenced.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Atkinson, Matt T
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 1:46 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> It doesn’t happen every single time does it? I can’t believe something
> like that wouldn’t have been discovered during QA.
>
>
>
> Has there been any idea what triggers the duplication of files if it only
> happens sporadically? We are putting together our plans for upgrading
> because we want to start testing Windows 10, but something like this would
> force us to hold off until they fix it in CU.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Roland Janus
> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 4:25 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Gee, just looked into the drivers for the HP Elitebook 800 G1 DM
>
> Source package folder goes from 400MB to 1.2GB in the package
>
>
>
> A single file in the source exists now 152 times in the package.
>
> Amazing that something like that wasn’t caught during basic testing…
>
>
>
> I have R2SP1 in prod. although no OSD yet, but obviously I need this to be
> fixed before deploying clients
>
>
>
> -R
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 9. Juli 2015 19:58
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Thanks Aaron for the update!
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Aaron Czechowski
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2015 1:39 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> FYI, we’ve reproduced and identified the issue. I’m talking with sustained
> engineering about getting into a future CU, but nothing committed yet.
> Continuing to work through support is your best course of action right now.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Stephen Leuthold
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 8, 2015 6:44 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Does anyone have updates on this issue or any other issues that would make
> one hesitant to upgrade in production?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Stephen
> ------------------------------
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:38:48 +0000
>
> FYI
>
>
>
>
> https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e6b39a1e-e66e-4223-8c94-46b62b7ebeac/sccm-2012-r2-sp1-driverpack-bug?forum=configmanagergeneral
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mike Dougherty
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 6:00 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> This occurred in my environment when I tried to download the Windows 7 x64
> drivers for the Z230 Workstation from here:
>
>
>
> http://ftp.hp.com/pub/caps-softpaq/cmit/HP_Driverpack_Matrix_x64.html
>
>
>
> I downloaded the .exe from the page, extracted it, imported the extracted
> driver content into SCCM 2012 R2 SP1 and tried to create a package of JUST
> those newly imported drivers.
>
>
>
> When I tried the package creation in this fashion, the driver package
> source ballooned to over 12GB (vs 1 GB of extracted content) before I
> forcibly stopped the process, as I was afraid our site server data drive
> would run out of space.
>
>
>
> The Realtek audio driver was the worst offender (creating multiple copies
> of the 183 MB folder, as there are 50 inf files in it), but it seemed to
> trip over the Intel Chipset driver folders as well.
>
>
>
> I deleted the imported drivers and semi-finished driver package for this
> model at that point.
>
>
>
> I then went ahead and deleted the Realtek audio driver sources from the
> extracted content and replaced them with previous version of the Realtek
> audio drivers available from HP for that model (which had 1 .inf in the
> folder instead of 50) and re-imported everything.
>
> After that, package creation finished, but the final driver package was
> about 3-4 GB (once again, vs. a 1 GB driver source size).
>
>
>
> I have imported and created driver packages for other HP models using the
> method above and there's a 1-1 relation in size of the driver source to the
> packages created prior to our SP1 upgrade.
>
>
>
> This isn't 100% scientific, but that's pretty much what I was seeing last
> week.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Underwood, Bob <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does this happen regardless of the method used to import drivers?  (i.e.,
> single INF versus scanning a directory for all drivers?)
>
>
>
> Can you provide a specific example of driver(s) that exhibit the
> behavior?  We can’t seem to reproduce the issue in our testing environment
> where SP1 is applied.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andreas Hammarskjöld
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 3:22 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> As I understood it applies to all new/updated packages after SP1 was
> installed.
>
>
>
> And yeah, I wouldn’t put SP1 in production…
>
>
>
> //A
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *John Aubrey
> *Sent:* den 7 juli 2015 22:18
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Mine increased. All the older drivers and packages are about the same.  I
> only had one new 2012 R2 driver package I have imported since SP1 and it
> went from 245 MB to 323 MB.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Miller, Todd
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2015 4:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Is this for every driver import or does it only happen under certain
> conditions?
>
>
>
> That’s big enough to stay away from SP1, I’d say.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:00 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> Can confirm, MS is aware. We haven’t upgraded to SP1 ourselves, but I know
> others that have and have tickets opened.
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mike Dougherty
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2015 12:45 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] Configuration Manager 2012 R2 SP1 Driver Package
> "Duplicates" bug
>
>
>
> I've seen this issue reported on Microsoft Connect and I've read anecdotal
> evidence that Microsoft is supposedly aware of the issue, but I wanted to
> reach out here to see if any can comment more-or-less officially whether or
> not this is a known issue...
>
>
>
> Long story short, since updating to R2 SP1, we've found that creating
> Driver Packages via the console causes massive content bloat.
>
>
>
> It seems that the process is a causing creation of a duplicate copy of the
> driver source for every .inf file in a driver source folder.
>
>
>
> For example, for model of hardware X, the audio driver source content
> folder has 50 .inf files in it.
>
> The folder containing the .inf files is 183 MB.
>
> When I go to create a driver package from this source, ConfigMgr creates
> 50 copies of the 183MB source folder when creating the driver package (or
> something along these lines).
>
>
>
> It caused me a minor freak-out last week when I was trying to create a
> driver package for 1 GB worth of content that ballooned to over 12GB in the
> "package" before I killed the process...
>
>
>
> Has anyone else seen this? Is MS aware of this issue?
>
>
>
> If you need me to provide more specifics, please let me know and I'll try
> to help out where I can.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
> the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is
> confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error,
> then delete it.  Thank you.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email
> is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual
> or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that
> this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are
> notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is
> strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your
> records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the
> following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of
> a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may
> contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are
> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to
> anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have
> received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by
> reply email and delete this message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to