Any chance you are forcing synchronous application of GPO? Unless required, you should let them go asynchronously and the user experience will be better (they'll get a desktop before all policy objects apply)
Nathan Shelby Director of Systems Engineering – Quote Wizard <https://quotewizard.com/> [email protected] / 206-753-2626 Malo Periculosam Libertatem Quam Quietum Servitium On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Kelsey, John <[email protected]> wrote: > We’re seeing significant logon delays due to the high number of GPOs that > have to get processed when a user logs in. We’re trying to clean up and > reduce the number of things that have to happen in order to get the user > logged on faster. If we block all GPOs in our testing, we’ve been able to > cut the logon time in half. So either we just have too many GPOs or a > couple of them for whatever reason is crushing the logon. > > > > > > Is it more efficient to have 200 GPOs that set 1 item in each one? > > OR > > Is it more efficient to have 1 GPO that sets 200 items? > > OR > > Does it not make any difference in how long it takes to process? > > > > Thanks all. > > > > *************************************** > *John C. Kelsey* > > Penn Highlands DuBois > (: 814.375.3073 > 2 : 814.375.4005 > *: [email protected] > *************************************** > > [image: PHH ESig Logo 150dpi] > > > > This email and any attached files are sensitive in nature and intended solely > for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should > not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions > expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of > Penn Highlands Healthcare or its affiliates.. Warning: Although precautions > have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the > company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from > the use of this email or attachments. > >
