Used to get this a lot with xp

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:45 Russ Rimmerman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> https://windows.uservoice.com/forums/265757-windows-feature-suggestions
>
>
>
> I believe just http://windows.uservoice.com will also take you there as
> well
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mote, Todd
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 9, 2015 8:14 PM
>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Problems applying GPOs with Windows 10?
>
>
>
> What can we do about it?  Where is appropriate to file this?  How can we
> get this some visibility? I don’t think there’s a Connect site for Windows
> is there?  Uservoice?
>
>
>
> Todd
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Johns, Damon (DoJ)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 9, 2015 5:51 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Problems applying GPOs with Windows 10?
>
>
>
> Yes can confirm that same behaviour in my domain – workstations require at
> least 2 restarts before all the Group Policy objects are applied to my
> Windows 10 instances – it was quite noticeable as the branding GPO hadn’t
> applied after my OSD Task Sequence completed even with the SMSTSPostAction
> set to do a restart.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Damon
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Marable, Mike
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 9 September 2015 9:42 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] Problems applying GPOs with Windows 10?
>
>
>
> Has anyone else had problems with GPO processing on Windows 10?
>
>
>
> I’m currently working on the Windows 10 replacement for one of our Windows
> 7 products and consistently I’m seeing GPOs not applying in a timely
> fashion (in particular the AppLocker policies).  Once the machine is built
> I have to reboot it a second time to get all the policies in place.  The
> Windows 7 equivalent never had this problem.
>
>
>
> Here is what I’m dealing with.  I have a single task sequence that will
> build using either Windows 10 or Windows 7 depending on a task sequence
> variable.  So the builds run through the same exact steps.  They are placed
> in OUs with identical GPOs applied.  I originally was setting the
> SMSTSPostAction variable to do a “shutdown –r –t 0” to reboot the machine
> at the end of the build.
>
>
>
> On a Windows 7 build the machine comes up with all GPOs processed.  It has
> the proper wallpaper and all the restrictions are in place.
>
>
>
> On a Windows 10 build the machine comes up and it has the wrong wallpaper
> and none of the restrictions are in place.  I have to reboot it a second
> time and only then does it come up properly.
>
>
>
> Trying to resolve this I’ve set up a clunky hack at the end of my task
> sequence.  SMSTSPostAction calls a batch file.  This batch file calls a
> PowerShell script.  The PoSh script sleeps for 30 seconds to allow the
> batch file to exit, return control back to the TS and so the TS can close
> out.  The PoSh script then continues with resetting the Provisioning keys
> in the Registry, sleeping another 30 seconds, does a GPUpdate, sleeps, does
> another GPUpdate, sleeps and then restarts the computer.
>
>
>
> With this in place the system comes up with most of the GPOs in place
> (i.e. the wallpaper is proper) but what concerns me is that the AppLocker
> policies that should have hidden “Search”, “Contact Support” and “Windows
> Feedback” did not apply.  They are all still present on the Start Menu.
> Now “Contact Support” and “Windows Feedback” report that they are blocked
> by the administrator, so although not perfect at least they are blocked.
> But the Search feature is still fully functional which allows the user (the
> general public in this scenario) to search and find things like
> PowerShell.  Once I reboot the machine a second time the AppLocker policy
> fully kicks in and Search is disabled.
>
>
>
> Once this second reboot has happened all new users who log in receive the
> full GPO settings so AppLocker prevents the Universal apps from appearing
> on the Start Menu, Search is disabled, etc. but only after the second
> reboot.
>
>
>
> I don’t want to further hack this and I’m hoping I’m just too deep in the
> woods and am missing something simple, but my next step will be to script
> in an immediate second reboot.
>
>
>
> Again, I have none of these troubles building a Windows 7 machine.
> Windows 7 is 100% ready immediately post build.
>
>
>
> *Mike Marable*
>
> Microsoft Systems Engineer Lead
>
> Enterprise Device Engineering and Management
>
> MCPS, MCITP, MCTS, MCSA, MCSE, MS  [Profile
> <http://www.mycertprofile.com/Profile/5319166625>] [Blog
> <http://thesystemsmonkey.wordpress.com/>]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> *"The difficult we do at once. The impossible takes a little longer."*
>
> -US Army Corps of Engineers
>
>
>
> *"It is better to have less thunder in the mouth and more lightning in the
> hand."*
>
> -Apache Proverb
>
>
>
> I will rise when I have fallen.
>
>
>
> *"Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered,
> you will never grow."*
>
> -Ralph Waldo Emerson
>
>
>
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
> The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected
> by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or
> persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are
> warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is
> unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please
> immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of
> the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the
> transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any
> unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to