I have an Edge Lite that I've been using for testing, and it's "okay"
The GUI is improved over earlier versions, so that's a plus. Lots of features, but the CLI will require some learning. Kind of a toss-up between the Edge Lite and a similarly priced Mikrotik device. I've been trying to find a reason to standardize on either of them (at the router level) for my clients, but I haven't yet found a good reason to do so. Regards, *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker> *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the SMB market…* * GPG: *1AF3 EEC3 7C3C E88E B0EF 4319 8F28 A483 A182 EF3A On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:06 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just looking at the ubiquiti light , and users claim 1000 users > > > http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Edge-Router-Lite-capabilities-Max-users-and-data-transfer/td-p/1086953 > > "I'd say that you'd probably be safe at 1000 users per unit. " > > > > I only started using ubiquiti about a week or so ago because a client went > out and bought them because they "saw it used at an event" > > So the Switch and app AP's are already ubiquiti , maybe just stick with > that? > > any real world feedback on them? > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Router Recommendations > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:53:10 +0000 > > > Have a look at these if you aren’t opposed to open source software. If > you buy the units from them it includes support as well. > > > > https://www.pfsense.org/products/ > > > > > > -- > There are 10 kinds of people in the world... > those who understand binary and those who don't. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *J- P > *Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2015 3:35 PM > *To:* NT <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Router Recommendations > > > > Hi all, > > Looking for a cost effective router to meet the following requirements; > > DHCP for up to 500 users (required) > > Bandwidth management / allocation / limit or whatever its termed > (required) > > Dual wan (preferred but not a deal breaker) > > Nothing else , no SSL, no VPN, literally no other services required > > > The location has a 100mb pipe , users will only be using wifi for the > basics; > email, tweeting etc.. > > thanks > > > > >
