I also had a similar issue when I was trying to pre-provision the client in
our image.
We moved to the client being installed via GPO/Client Push.

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:54 PM Mote, Todd <[email protected]> wrote:

> If the image wasn’t syspreped correctly that could definitely be a
> possibility.  In my case the client was trying to use a different cert to
> auth to an sccm object that had previously used a another cert.  same
> system, but because the certs were different it was trying to register a
> new object with the same name, and I would end up with the same sorts of
> things in the logs.  At the beginning of all that in the logs, I seem to
> recall there being an entry like “Client registration status = 2” or
> something similar, before it started to do the “sleep for” business…
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Beardsley, James
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2015 2:28 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
>
>
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Problems with client registration
>
>
>
> No, certs aren’t expired. Most of these machines are brand new. I think it
> might be because the client was installed on the image on accident when our
> hardware team was building a new image and the image had a different name.
> I’m going to look into that further. Thanks for the input.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mote, Todd
> *Sent:* Friday, October 02, 2015 3:36 PM
> *To:* '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Problems with client registration
>
>
>
> Are your certs expiring or are there new ones that the client has selected
> to use that were different from the original one?  I had similar issues
> with clients earlier this summer and the culprit was the client was
> choosing a different cert than it had been using.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Beardsley, James
> *Sent:* Friday, October 2, 2015 12:38 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] Problems with client registration
>
>
>
> For the last two to three weeks, I’m seeing this problem more and more
> where machines are having trouble completing registration and I have to
> delete the client from the console and restart the ccmexec service in order
> to fix it. Or in extreme cases, in addition to deleting it from the
> console, I have to go on the machine and delete the SMSCFG.ini file,
> re-enroll a new client cert, then repair the client (I’m not sure if all of
> those steps are required but it fixes the issue nonetheless). In the past,
> if there was a duplicate record, the client would still register, but the
> old record would go obsolete. It doesn’t seem like that’s happening now
> which is requiring some manual intervention described above. I can’t think
> of anything that has changed recently that would cause this. Any ideas on
> where to begin troubleshooting this? I’ve already confirmed in Hierarchy
> Settings that I have it set to “Automatically resolve conflicting records”.
>
>
>
>
>
> *James Beardsley |* Firm Technology Group
>
> Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP
>
>
>
> [image: cid:8644FC49-D5C9-45AE-B387-04FAFC0CC7A5] <http://www.dhgllp.com/>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail is intended only for the addressee
> named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or
> dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on
> its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above
> immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you
> for your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail is intended only for the addressee
> named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or
> dissemination of this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on
> its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, please reply to the sender listed above
> immediately and permanently delete this message from your inbox. Thank you
> for your cooperation.
>
>
>



Reply via email to