FWIW, we had a lot of issues with Mimecast's greylisting functionality. We promptly switched to Proofpoint and have been happy since.
- Sean On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Richard Stovall <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the replies, everyone. We are on-premise Exchange, and I don't > see that changing anytime soon. The Exchange ATP service appears to be the > type of thing I'm looking for, but it's only for hosted customers. AFAICT, > MX Guarddog only uses signature-based AV, so they're out. Mimecast and > Proofpoint look worth pursuing. Thanks again. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Michael Tavares <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Having used EOP for several months, my recommendation would be to look at >> another product. I have had a lot of malware get through EOP. Submitted >> samples to MS and they are baffled as to why they get through. Not sure >> having to pay extra for Exchange Advanced Threat Protection is worth it. >> I have moved on to proofpoint, much better filtering results with them. >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brian Desmond >> *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 4:47 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] E-mail threat protection service for SMBs >> >> >> >> *Have you looked at the Exchange Online Protection and Exchange Advanced >> Threat Protection offerings? * >> >> >> *Thanks, Brian* >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [ >> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Richard Stovall >> *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2015 1:16 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] E-mail threat protection service for SMBs >> >> >> >> I am looking to add another layer of anti-malware/anti-phishing/anti-spam >> protection to our company's e-mail and am thinking about adding a hosted >> service to the mix. We have an on-premise Barracuda (which I like and plan >> to keep) and its native abilities combined with some pretty restrictive >> filtering policies have worked well for us. We've been lucky so far, but >> it requires a lot of manual work to triage quarantined items. >> >> >> >> Ideally I'm looking for a service that actually opens and detonates all >> types of allowed attachments and linked URLs with a view to looking for >> signs of malicious activity. >> >> >> >> Proofpoint Essentials looks interesting. Are there any others out there >> I should be looking at? >> >> >> >> Also, for those that haven't seen it, there is a very interesting site at >> https://www.reverse.it/ that does fascinating work analyzing uploaded >> files for signs of malware. Similar to virustotal.com but much more >> analysis rather than just AV results. They have a solution that I'm >> looking at as well. >> > >
