You can get all your machines to use V1 hashes if you wish. It's a GPO setting 
on the 8.1/10 clients which downgrades the hash version. Then they would all 
play nice together, although V1 hashes are nowhere near as efficient as V2 and 
you lose DeDupe capability for the newer clients etc..


Cheers

Phil



Phil Wilcock
2Pint Software
http://2pintsoftware.com
@2pintsoftware



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Hyatt, Dewayne
Sent: 12 October 2015 18:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache - Windows 7 to Windows 8/10

That's what I assumed but I should have done more homework!

Thanks Nick

Dewayne

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache - Windows 7 to Windows 8/10

See the section "Content Information Versions"

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831696.aspx

Content information that is compatible with computers running Windows Server 
2008 R2 and Windows 7 is called version 1, or V1.
Content information that is compatible with computers running Windows Server 
2012 and Windows 8 is called version 2
"When you deploy BranchCache in distributed cache mode, clients that use 
different content information versions do not share content with each other."

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hyatt, Dewayne
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:36 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [mssms] BranchCache - Windows 7 to Windows 8/10

I was playing around with BranchCache in my test environment and I noticed the 
following behavior:

4 VM's, 2x Windows 7, 1x Windows 8.1, 1x Windows 10

Windows 8.1/10 will not pull from Windows 7, but will from one another.
Windows 7 will pull from Windows 7 (duh) but not from 8.1/10

Has anyone noticed this behavior?

It's not a big deal, just an observation. My environment is mostly Windows 7 
but we have a lot of remote sites with horrible links and I thought this might 
be useful.

Thanks,

Dewayne






Reply via email to