I've been running our organization on Synologys for our shared storage for
more than a year now.  Been rock solid.  Our EqualLogic had reached EOL,
and I could buy two Synology units (for replicating to themselves) for half
the price of an EqualLogic...

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I’ve got the same type of issues with Buffalo and Iomega NAS as well.
> Just stop responding, and need a hard reboot to reaccess.  As all of ours
> are either beyond warranty, or quickly reaching end of warranty, I’ll take
> a look at the Synology brand.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Micheal Espinola Jr
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:05 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] Synology NAS Recommendations
>
>
>
> The types of issues I've dealt with could not be rectified or managed, as
> the problem only became increasingly worse, with a shorter MTF with each
> occurrence - until the devices were not capable of enough uptime to
> complete backups,  It was a problem with the hardware that the Drobo techs
> could not or would not explain.
>
>
>
> The issues I experienced all started off with the devices becoming
> suddenly inaccessible.  Even local direct access would not work.  The
> device would have to be hard-booted in order to recover.  Over time it
> would require multiple hard-boot attempts and/or delays with the device
> being completely off.  Everything made me believe it was an overheating
> component issue.  Drobo techs could not or would not confirm.
>
>
>
> My advice would be to use them the least amount as possible.  Use for
> recovery purposes may prove to be impossible because of the same issues
> outlined above.  If anything I've written rings true for you at all, lose
> the devices as soon as possible.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Espi
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Darren Martin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Similar issues with Drobos here. Any advice on keeping them running after
> support expires??
>
> Thanks.
>
> D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 7:03 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Synology NAS Recommendations
>
> Just seeing this post now...
>
>
> I am a former/current Drobo admin/user as well as a Synology admin/user
> for a few years now.  My opinion is pretty plain and simple:  Drobos are
> crap.  Synologys are good.
>
> I was initially impressed with Drobos until I started to deploy and
> maintain them in large environments.  The bigger/busier the environment,
> the worse they are.  Performance goes exponentially in the toilet to the
> point of literal unavailability - aka, it kills them.  I've had Drobo
> support replace quite a few of them, only to experience the same problems
> after prolonged use.  I was primarily using them as backup devices.  Very
> large/long backup jobs can kill them.  I seriously recommend removing
> any/all at your first opportunity.
>
>
> Synology is my current go-to for these types of devices.  I haven't
> experienced any issues of note.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Espi
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Gordon Pegue <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>         I currently have a DroboPro unit populated with 8 – Seagate
> Constellation ES 2GB drives connected to a server via iSCSI.
>
>         The unit is used to store backup sets and other file/folder
> content for my modest Windows network.
>
>         The hardware is robust and very stable but using Drobo Dashboard
> to do anything beyond checking device status is painful….
>
>
>
>         I’ve lurked here for some time and see repeated recommendations
> for and kudos given to Synology NAS units.
>
>
>
>         Before I can pitch to management my thoughts on replacing the
> Drobo unit, I was wondering if anyone on this list was a former Drobo user
> and now a Synology user who might comment on the transition.
>
>
>
>         Inviting any other commentary/recommendations as seen fit.
>
>
>
>         TIA
>
>         Gordon
>
>
>

Reply via email to