Based on the revision numbers that would not appear to be the case. Revision
200 is the active one and revision 201 / 202 are declined. Since the declined
instance has 2 different revisions and the associated dates, what's the best
way to determine what version of the patch is actually being deployed?
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary and those who don't.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Outlook patch issue?
WSUS has already declined the expired updates. When the new update comes in,
it expires the older one automatically.
On 11/16/2015 9:04 AM, Melvin Backus wrote:
>
> I'm seeing multiple instances of this patch now in WSUS. When I check
> the revision status there is currently a revision 200, which got
> approved and installed. There is also a 2^nd with revisions 201 and
> 202 which is flagged as declined. Since we do security updates as
> auto approved, what would flag those for declined?
>
> All that said, I'm seeing the best process for actually applying the
> updated version of the patch as to flag the original for removal, then
> approve the newer one. Am I missing anything there?
>
> --
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
> those who understand binary and those who don't.
>
> *From:* [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kennedy, Jim
> *Sent:* Friday, November 13, 2015 9:29 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] RE: Outlook patch issue?
>
> 3097877 is the problem child this month. It was killing Outlook and
> was revised Thursday morning. Not killing outlook anymore but still
> killing touchscreens on Win 7.
>
> *From:*[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Melvin Backus
> *Sent:* Friday, November 13, 2015 9:22 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [NTSysADM] Outlook patch issue?
>
> Anyone seeing any issues with KB3101535 for Outlook?
>
> We've seen some folks suddenly start having issues with Outlook not
> starting up and removing that patch seems to be the solution to the
> issue. Still investigating, but I figured here was a good place to
> pose the question.
>
> Thanks
>
> --------------------
> Melvin Backus | Sr. Systems Engineer | Byers Engineering Company |
> 404.497.1565
>
> Service Desk | 404-497-1599 | http://servicedesk.byers.com
>
> --
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
> those who understand binary and those who don't.
>
