Well... without trying to piss on someone else's parade... the best quote we 
got was from someone senior within MS:  "BranchCache with your (2Pint 
Software's) add-ons is a Formula 1 car, we are building a moped"

That said, it will fit the bill and help for companies that cannot use 
BranchCache for whatever reason. Although I still don't really see a single 
reason not to use BranchCache. Phil is working on a detailed comparison but 
here are a few items:


1.       Uses Packages from CCM Cache of other machines, so needs to be package 
with right version and fully downloaded.

2.       Only for WinPE initiated content at the moment.

3.       If source is not available (see point 1) it goes over the WAN at full 
throttle.

4.       There is no de-duplication...

So new image and you got to DL the whole thing over the wire again... meanwhile 
BC works on chunks. So can use the old image and/or deploy loads simultaneous 
machines and they will all share content among the active peers.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 8 december 2015 23:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mssms] Windows PE peer cache

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt613173.aspx

Phil and Andreas should be interested in that subject :)

Any comments?

-R





Reply via email to