Any business-grade firewall can do that. Kurt
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:21 PM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > I did leave out one other requirement, which I would hope a corporate > firewall can handle , that is WAN IP ALIAS > > so the WAN interface can listen on multiple IP addresses for different > services (i.e. x.x.x.1 email x.x.x.2 citrix x.x.x.3 web server etc..) > > \ > > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:05:28 -0500 > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Cisco 5506 - (was new firewall) > To: [email protected] > > I'd recommend a Fortinet 60D or maybe a 90 > > What is your anticipated budget for this? > > > > > > > > *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* <http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker> > *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for > the SMB market…* > > * GPG: *1AF3 EEC3 7C3C E88E B0EF 4319 8F28 A483 A182 EF3A > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:40 AM, J- P <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I was looking at new firewalls for a small office > 50 users- ~100 nodes > dual wan 100mb & 25 mb > support for 5 vpn tunnels and a few dial in users > > I emailed a vendor and they recommended the New 5506, so in doing my due > diligence , i came across MANY MANY people that are not happy with this > "upgrade of the 5505". here is a link from the Cisco forums where everyone > is less than pleased > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12456891/asa-5506-x-switchports > > anyone have any feedback, also given my above specs I would appreciate any > recommendations / suggestions for a new FW. > > thanks > > PS: after i mentioned my findings to the vendor, he said perhaps a > fortinet maybe better suited > > thanks > > > >
