you can have a look at this report 
http://eskonr.com/2015/10/sccm-configmgr-sql-query-how-to-get-list-of-patches-required-by-specific-computer/
 to find list of missing/required updates but to see installed updates, you can 
change the value of status in sql query. 
i would think of using CI feature to check if particular patch installed or not 
using wmi check condition. 


Regards,
Eswar Koneti
www.eskonr.com
sent from mobile device,please excuse any typo's as a result. 



On Jan 7, 2016, 1:54 AM, at 1:54 AM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
>If they are security patches, we always use win32_quickfixengineering.
>Works well.
>
>Daniel Ratliff
>
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Timm
>Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 12:38 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [mssms] Find computers with specific windows updates
>installed.
>
>All,
>
>I have been tasked with hunting down workstations that have certain
>unwanted windows KB's installed. I have tried creating a collection
>based on a WQL query but it doesn't return any results. If I recall
>windows updates aren't listed in programs and features any longer. So
>that may be why there aren't any results.
>
>
>select
>SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
>from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64 on
>SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64.ResourceId =
>SMS_R_System.ResourceId where
>SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64.DisplayName like "%KB3068708%" or
>SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64.DisplayName like "%KB3022345%" or
>SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64.DisplayName like "%KB3075249%" or
>SMS_G_System_ADD_REMOVE_PROGRAMS_64.DisplayName like "%KB3080149%"
>
>
>I've also tried a configuration baseline based off of info listed in:
>https://www.windows-noob.com/forums/topic/8640-sccm-2012-search-for-installed-hotfixes/
>
>I am applying that against a test collection that contains both machine
>that have them installed, and machines that don't have them installed.
>The deployment results show 100% compliant, which aren't the results I
>am expecting.
>
>Can anyone offer up any advice on what I'm doing wrong, or how I could
>go about finding them?
>
>Thanks!
>Mike Timm
>Systems Engineer
>Overstock.com
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use and
>review of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
>contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader
>of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
>responsible for delivering the message solely to the intended
>recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
>or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>received this communication in error, please notify sender immediately
>by telephone or return email. Thank you.
>
>
>The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
>to which it is addressed
>and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this
>material/information in error,
>please contact the sender and delete or destroy the
>material/information.



Reply via email to