Just curious... we use SCUP and the rules direct from Adobe for any catalogs
Adobe chooses to offer. It just seems more direct that way, and sustainable
(and always "faster" than waiting for any other 3rd party to re-do them in
their catalog).
Do you have some awesome SMA or powershell or some kind of super-cool
automation around Secunia where you really, really want the updates there, vs.
direct from Adobe?
On Monday, January 11, 2016 8:47 PM, Duncan McAlynn
<[email protected]> wrote:
<!-- _filtered #yiv0400607919 {font-family:Wingdings;} _filtered
#yiv0400607919 {font-family:"Cambria Math";} _filtered #yiv0400607919
{font-family:Calibri;} _filtered #yiv0400607919
{font-family:Consolas;}#yiv0400607919 p.yiv0400607919MsoNormal, #yiv0400607919
li.yiv0400607919MsoNormal, #yiv0400607919 div.yiv0400607919MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;}#yiv0400607919 a:link, #yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0400607919 a:visited, #yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0400607919
p.yiv0400607919MsoPlainText, #yiv0400607919 li.yiv0400607919MsoPlainText,
#yiv0400607919 div.yiv0400607919MsoPlainText
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;}#yiv0400607919 span.yiv0400607919NurTextZchn
{font-family:Consolas;}#yiv0400607919 p.yiv0400607919msonormal0, #yiv0400607919
li.yiv0400607919msonormal0, #yiv0400607919 div.yiv0400607919msonormal0
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman", serif;}#yiv0400607919 p.yiv0400607919PlainText, #yiv0400607919
li.yiv0400607919PlainText, #yiv0400607919 div.yiv0400607919PlainText
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;}#yiv0400607919 span.yiv0400607919PlainTextChar
{font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919E-MailFormatvorlage22 {font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919E-MailFormatvorlage23 {font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919E-MailFormatvorlage24 {font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv0400607919
span.yiv0400607919E-MailFormatvorlage25 {font-family:"Calibri",
sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv0400607919 .yiv0400607919MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv0400607919 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt
72.0pt;}#yiv0400607919 div.yiv0400607919WordSection1 {}-->Just as an update, I
have received word from the product group that we did ship the update today, as
promised.
Sent from Outlook Mobile
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:32 PM -0800, "Roland Janus" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Lol, shameless J I was in particular asking if you provide the update Secunia
is refusing to? -R Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Patch My PC Support
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2016 17:27
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: [mssms] 3rd party patch management question Hi Roland, We are
doing great J! Adding new products often full list available
here:https://patchmypc.net/supported-products-scup-catalog Our release history
is typically to get the update out in our SCUP catalog the day it’s released
history available here:https://patchmypc.net/feed Our price is still 1$ per
client annually. Thanks, MariePatch My PC SupportSupport Number: +1 (720)
408-4659Support Email: [email protected] Forum:
https://patchmypc.net/forum From: mailto:[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 4:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AW: [mssms] 3rd party patch management question My take would be they
need to provide what the vendor provides, regardless what it patches or
fixes…Only providing a secure but broken installation is stupid, hence you need
to go back to an older version, not broken but unsecure. If I would evaluate
vendors for that, with that input, I would look what others do. What is
Patchmypc doing? Von: mailto:[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Miller, Todd
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 22:05
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [mssms] 3rd party patch management question I am having an argument
with my 3rd party match management vendor – Secunia/Flexera, and I am curious
how other vendors handle this situation. Recently, Adobe released a security
update for Flash-- 20.0.0.267 that had a bug in it and then a couple of days
later released 20.0.0.270 to correct the bug. I need to patch Flash because
there are security vulnerabilities in version 20.0.0.235. The only option
Secunia has for us is to deploy version 20.0.0.267 which corrects known
security vulnerabilities, but has a known critical functional bug. Secunia
refuses to offer 20.0.0.270 because they consider it a “bug fix” and not a
“security update” Secunia is in the business of patching security
vulnerabilities not supplying patches that fix functional bugs. I am curious to
know how the other patch vendor solutions are handling this issue. Does your
third party patch solution offer all patches for Flash or only ones that plug
security holes? Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please
reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete
it. Thank you.
