On the root domain.

I go into DNS. I go to the root domain.Inside of there is an entry for the
child domain. If I click on it, it shows

(same as parent folder) NS   Root-DC-#5
(the one where the DNS tests list as having broken delegation)

And that's all it says. That can't be right, can it? I need something else
here, but I dunno what. In Properties, I see a section for "Name Servers",
and it lists just this one DC. Shouldn't it list other DCs for this child
domain?




On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Michael Leone <[email protected]> wrote:

> From the looks of it, the child domain seems fine, replicating among
> itself. it's the interaction with the root domain that seems all
> screwed up.
>
> There are 3 root DCs in this site.
>
> dcdiag says:
>
> The DNS tests say that all tests pass on 2 of them (#4 and #6); but
> DNS delegation is broken on #5 ...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Michael Leone <[email protected]> wrote:
> > SO I apparently have a big problem. We run a parent-child domain
> > structure here. And today I noticed that I was having replication
> > failures between the DCs in the root domain and some of the DCs in the
> > child domain.
> >
> > I do dnslint on the DC in the child domain, all is fine. I do dnslint
> > on the DC in the root domain, and I get errors. Specifically, missing
> > glue records for all 6 DCs in the child domain.
> >
> > I don't know how they could have disappeared. I know we demoted a DC
> > in the child domain a couple weeks ago, but that was a graceful
> > demotion, and showed no errors. Nothing was done in the root domain
> > (we actually haven't done anything manual to it in years). But
> > something screwed up royally, obviously.
> >
> > And I'm not sure where to go here. I get that I need to create A
> > records in my DNS (dunno how they disappeared), but I don't know how
> > to do that, since they are for the DCs in the child domain.
> >
> > And this has to be done at the root domain level, unless I am totally
> > mis-understanding.
> >
> > Any help greatly appreciated. Apparently replication has been screwed
> > up for 12 or 13 days now.
>

Reply via email to