#2.

I've done it and so has Kent (as noted). Backup and restore to a different/new 
OS is fully supported - ConfigMgr doesn't care, why would it? The bits are 
being reinstalled during the recovery. The problem with going from 2008/2008R2 
to 2012/2012 R2 in-place is that so many thing change like the IIS version and 
WSUS version. There's no way for ConfigMgr to handle these things changing - 
from its perspective - out of nowhere. But in a site restore scenario, the site 
server is a completely new install so the difference aren't problematic; it's 
simply installed accounting for them.

The first link that Todd posted below explicitly says this under the section 
titled Upgrade of the Site Server Operating System:

"Install System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with the service pack level 
that you want and perform a site recovery. This scenario requiresyou to have a 
site backup that was created by using the Backup Site Server maintenance task 
on the original Configuration Manager site, and that you use the same 
installation settings for the new System Center 2012 Configuration Manager 
site."

J

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Chris Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:31 PM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

Totally agree. Just trying to build a list of options for clients who may not 
want to pay for a large, complicated SCCM migration, when their main goal is to 
get Windows 10 deployed :)

So right now, it looks like the options for someone who has their primary on 
2008R2 are the following.


1.       Migrate to a new hierarchy running 2012R2 as the OS.

2.       Backup and restore the DB on to a server running 2012R2, keeping the 
same name and source code.

3.       Upgrade OS from 2008R2 to 2012R2, once it I supported by SCCM.



Chris Barnes

Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant
* 248.767.4415 cell
* chris.bar...@coretekservices.com
*   http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/>

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:21 PM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

Personally I'd never run a production server that has an OS that has been 
upgraded from one major version to another. I can live with R updates only

________________________________
        John Marcum
            MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
              Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

  [H_Logo]

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:50 AM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

Yea, that's what I was looking at before, and that is what Michael N hinted at 
may be changing for a later build of SCCM, to allow an OS upgrade from 2008R2 
to 2012R2.

Can anyone provide a location for the support statement about the DB backup and 
restore on to a new OS? Just watched the session at System Center Universe 
where Kent Agerlund does this pretty seamlessly, but just because you can do 
it, doesn't mean its supported, and that you should do it.





Chris Barnes

Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant
* 248.767.4415 cell
* chris.bar...@coretekservices.com
*   http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/>

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:22 AM
To: 'ms...@lists.myitforum.com' 
<ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

:D

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682077.aspx#BKMK_UpgradeInfrastructure

Upgrade of the Site Server Operating System<javascript:void(0)>
________________________________
Configuration Manager supports an in-place upgrade of the operating system of 
the site server in the following situations:
*         In-place upgrade to a higher Windows Server service pack as long as 
the resulting service pack level remains supported by Configuration Manager.
*         In-place upgrade from Windows Server 2012to Windows Server 2012 R2.
Configuration Manager does not support the following Windows Server upgrade 
scenarios.
*         Any version of Windows Server 2008 to any version of Windows Server 
2008 R2 or later.
*         Any version of Windows Server 2008 to any version of Windows Server 
2012 or later.
*         Any version of Windows Server 2008 R2 to any version of Windows 
Server 2012 or later.
When a direct operating system upgrade is not supported, perform one of the 
following procedures after you have installed the new operating system:
*         Install System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with the service 
pack level that you want, and configure the site according to your requirements.
*         Install System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with the service 
pack level that you want and perform a site recovery. This scenario requires 
you to have a site backup that was created by using the Backup Site Server 
maintenance task on the original Configuration Manager site, and that you use 
the same installation settings for the new System Center 2012 Configuration 
Manager site.


From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:15 AM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] RE: Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

It is supported. I say this specifically because I mistakenly said in this list 
that it is not supported and someone posted a link to technet stating that it 
is. :)

Personally I am in the same situation and I'm still leaning towards a 
side-by-side migration because it offers more flexibility.

________________________________
        John Marcum
            MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
              Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________

  [H_Logo]

From: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com> 
[mailto:listsadmin@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 5:11 PM
To: ms...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ms...@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] Upgrading to SCCM 1511 w/ 2008R2 Primary Site OS

Curious how everyone is handling this scenario?

Working on scoping out multiple engagements where a client desires to upgrade 
from SCCM 2012 to v1511, but their Primary Site Server is running 2008R2 as the 
OS. From what I am reading, 2008R2 will not be supported as a Site Server OS 
after October of 2016. 
(https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt210917.aspx)

It seems that recommending a new hierarchy, and doing a side by side migration 
is the safest way to go, however I am seeing some people (Jason S) recommending 
a backup and restore on to a 2012R2 OS. I can't find anything stating where 
this is a supported action by Microsoft.

Thoughts?



Chris Barnes

Coretek Services | Enterprise Consultant
* 248.767.4415 cell
* chris.bar...@coretekservices.com
*   http://www.coretekservices.com<http://www.coretekservices.com/>



________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.








Reply via email to