Wow...
I feel like I just read my own mind:)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 4:58 PM
To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OT: RE: [NTSysADM] SOLVED: My ignorance is showing again...

For whisky (or whiskey, depending), I'm partial to Lagavulin (16yr),
Laphroig (12yr) (both very smoky - I can't afford the older stuff),
Knob Creek Single Barrel Reserve (and regular - excellent both very
good bourbons), and Bunnahabhain (12yr). The last of those isn't
really smoky, but it's a very fine sipping Scotch - and I can't afford
the older bottlings of that one either.

Not a vodka fan, nor really any other liquors.

Heck, even my favorite cocktail is a bourbon boulevardier (some
recipes call for rye whiskey:
imbibemagazine.com/the-boulevardier-cocktail-recipe

Kurt

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I always stop by Downtown Spirits off Denny Ave. when I'm actually staying in 
> Seattle vs. across the lake. They have lots of specialty items to pick and 
> choose from. I picked up a really smoky local whiskey there last summer that 
> was fantastic. "Westland Peated Moss".
>
> I'm not really into beers, I'm more of a sipping whiskey kind of guy.
>
> Although I also like GOOD vodkas. And it was at Downtown Spirits where I 
> first found Russian Standard Platinum vodka. Best vodka I've ever had.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:17 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] SOLVED: My ignorance is showing again...
>
> Well now - that looks very interesting.
>
> I'll have to see if someone carries it here in the Redmond area.
>
> I am very partial to Belgian style beers, which makes me a bit of an outlier 
> here - most local breweries want to produce incredible hop monsters, and I 
> really don't enjoy those at all.
>
> The BBQ is nearly sweet, and the cherry flavors, along with the notes 
> introduced by the barreling, make it something I just love to death.
>
> Kurt
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Maglinger, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Looks good, but I can get this now.
>> http://www.kentuckyale.com/portfolio_page/kentuckybourbonbarrelale/?age-verified=9de43add1d
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:57 PM
>> To: ntsysadm
>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] SOLVED: My ignorance is showing again...
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> But just one beer, not six, and it won't be available until November:
>> https://www.boulevard.com/BoulevardBeers/bourbon-barrel-quad/
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Webster <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Time for a beer or six.
>>>
>>>
>>> Webster
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:09 PM
>>> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [NTSysADM] SOLVED: My ignorance is showing again...
>>>
>>> Well, holy mackerel!
>>>
>>> I found it!
>>>
>>> I used "usdmzdc01p.dmz.example.com\kurt-dmz", and the password change took!
>>>
>>> Couldn't use the bare domain, had to specify the DC.
>>>
>>> It's only noon, and I've solved a real problem.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Miller Bonnie L.
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Yep, that is what I meant both domain\username and [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:41 AM
>>>> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] My ignorance is showing again...
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what you mean - but let me show what I've tried:
>>>>
>>>> The DMZ forest is dmz.example.com, while production is example.com (don't 
>>>> yell, I didn't set up the DMZ forest). I press ALT+CTRL+DEL on my machine 
>>>> in the production forest, and select "Change a password"
>>>> (I'm running Win8.1), then type in the ID and old password and new 
>>>> password in the relevant fields.
>>>>
>>>> For the ID, I've tried [email protected], [email protected], 
>>>> dmz.example.com\kurt-dmz and dmz.example\kurt-dmz, and get the same error 
>>>> message in all cases.
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried using the name of the DC - 
>>>> [email protected] - and get the same error message.
>>>>
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Miller Bonnie L.
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Do you get the same results with netbios vs UPN logon?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bonnie
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:41 PM
>>>>> To: ntsysadm <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: [NTSysADM] My ignorance is showing again...
>>>>>
>>>>> We have two separate, untrusted forests - DMZ and production.
>>>>>
>>>>> Production is at DFL/FFL 2008.
>>>>> DMZ is at DFL/FFL 2012R2
>>>>>
>>>>> I changed a password for an account in the DMZ forest, setting it to 
>>>>> require change at next logon.
>>>>>
>>>>> User cannot RDP from machine in production forest to machine in DMZ 
>>>>> forest because the password must be changed first.
>>>>>
>>>>> User cannot change password on machine in production forest for
>>>>> account in DMZ forest using ALT+CTRL+DEL, because he's getting the
>>>>> message:
>>>>>
>>>>>       "configuration information could not be read from the domain 
>>>>> controller,
>>>>>      either because the machine is unavailable, or access has been 
>>>>> denied."
>>>>>
>>>>> I know I can unset the requirement to change the password at next logon, 
>>>>> but that seems silly, because then I can't enforce having him change it 
>>>>> without standing over his shoulder while he does it.
>>>>>
>>>>> How the heck can I do this? I've tried with my own user accounts, and 
>>>>> have confirmed the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kurt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to