HP do something well? Well bugger me…

I feel a lot of love for Nutanix, if hyperconverged is your thing


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
Sent: 22 February 2016 14:20
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Server Hardware

+1 for HP Tech Support.  I’ve had the least amount of problems with them than 
ANY of my other OEMs.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Tallarita
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:03 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Server Hardware

I'm an HP guy - I find the product to just work, and in my experiences HP 
support has been top notch.

For a virtual environment, with room to grow, I'd go for Gen 8's or the newer 
Gen 9's, Dual HexaCore minimum, 128GB RAM and 8 NIC's to allow for a management 
channel, iSCSI channel, VMotion and fail-over with LAGG. As far as the drives, 
if your using VMware don't bother, use a SAN and boot from an SD card.  If you 
must go with internal drives, try to go with RAID'ed SSD's, they will perform 
exceptionally better  in a virtual environment.

Regards,

Andrew Tallarita
IT Support Specialist
BNL Industries Inc,.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
ph: 860.870.6222
cell: 860.849.1654
http://www.bnl.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. This notice serves as 
a confidentiality marking for the purpose of any confidentiality or 
nondisclosure agreement. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you should 
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail, if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender, therefore, does not 
accept liability for any errors, omissions or damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this error.

Information contained herein is subject to the Code of Federal Regulations 
Chapter 22 International Traffic in Arms Regulations. This data may not be 
resold, diverted, transferred, transshipped, made available to a foreign 
national within the United States, or otherwise disposed of in any other 
country outside of its intended destination, either in original form or after 
being incorporated through an intermediate process into other data without the 
prior written approval of the US Department of State.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Hank Arnold 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My preference would be Lenovo or HP.

I’d consider upping the memory to 128GB or even 256GB depending on what the 5 
machines will be doing. Your configuration will, on average give less than 16 
GB to each of 5 systems.

RAID 5?? Really?? I would go for 15K drives and consider 6 drives, 1 RAID-1 for 
the base OS and a RAID 10 for the VMs.  How big the drives should be dependent 
on the needs of the 4 VMs.

Why 3 NICs?


Regards,
Hank Arnold
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable.
Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself,
and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams

Microsoft MVP - Consumer Security
My Blog: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/personal-pc-assistant/
Twitter: @Hank_PCDoc
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hank.arnold.96

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] 
On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:31 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] Server Hardware

It has been almost 7 years since I selected server hardware.

What are peoples preference? I used to be a big HP fan mostly because I used  
Compaq servers back in the day.  I had a lot of clients use Dell mostly because 
of the price but I found there support poor.  How are Lenovo Servers?  I am a 
big ThinkPad fan.

I am building a product where I need to deploy a large amount  of servers at 
remote locations.  Each server will need to run 4 VMs  Microsoft’s recommended  
 specs are:



o   64-bit dual processor, six core (12 real cores), 2.50 gigahertz (GHz) or 
higher

o   64 gigabytes (GB) ECC RAM

o   Four 600 GB (or better) 10K RPM 128M Cache SAS 6Gbps disks, configured in a 
RAID 5 configuration

o   Three 1 Gbps RJ45 high throughput network adapters



Remote monitoring and management will be key.  I will most likely  be deploying 
Operations Manager but I need to confirm if I can install software on the Guest 
 OS .



Cheers

Ryan





Reply via email to