Depends on the situation. Assuming both sites have Internet access, first choice would be an IPSec tunnel between the firewalls protecting each site, if the firewalls are capable of such (and I'm not aware of any that aren't.)
Next would probably be an IPSec tunnel between a pair of OpenVPN machines at each site (maybe using pfsense or even just FreeBSD.) If the sites don't have, and are prohibited from having, Internet access - then a point-to-point link of whatever speed is necessary. Should be a simple routing setup at that point. Kurt On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Ryan Finnesey <[email protected]> wrote: > What would be your first choice? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 1:17 PM > To: ntsysadm <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Direct access > > I believe it can (for 2008R2 and later), but you'll want to make sure that > you can manage out. > > It certainly wouldn't be my first choice, though. > > Kurt > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ryan Finnesey <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can Direct Access be used to connect servers in a remote location or >> is it only supported with desktops? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Ryan >> >> > >
