Completely agree with Sherry and John. This is why we are moving our 72k clients to a single Primary with SCCM (CB). We will be so happy to not have a CAS.
Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 9:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [mssms] RE: CAS vs Stand-Alone Primary - Network traffic question There's no legitimate reason to even consider a CAS with only 10,000 clients. ________________________________ John Marcum MCITP, MCTS, MCSA Desktop Architect Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP ________________________________ [MVP] <https://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/overview> [MMS] <http://mmsmoa.com/> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lai, Jerry Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:19 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] CAS vs Stand-Alone Primary - Network traffic question Hi, Need some ball park estimates of database sizes and network traffic. So, we are in the design stage of our SCCM 2012 implementation. Our first decision is to choose between a CAS model or Single Primary Site model. We've agreed, in principal, to go with the single Primary model with co-located SQL db. But we need to present both designs. Our company is a newly merged with both previous companies currently running SCCM 2007 and still managing their own clients separately. We are trying to figure out what the network impact will be with the replication traffic of the CAS and two Primary Sites. The merged company will have about 10,000 devices being managed globally. I couldn't get any definitive answers or ball park numbers through Google research. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Thanks, Jerry Herbert Smith Freehills LLP and its subsidiaries and Herbert Smith Freehills, an Australian Partnership, are separate member firms of the international legal practice known as Herbert Smith Freehills. This message is confidential and may be covered by legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by return email or by calling our main switchboard on +612 9225 5000 and delete the email. Further information is available from www.herbertsmithfreehills.com<http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/>, including our Privacy Policy which describes how we handle personal information. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
