So.... I'm a consultant. I also assisted in the development of the original 
courseware for Direct Access for Windows 7. I've also deployed it for a number 
of clients. My perspective is tinged from those things.

DA _is_ a traditional VPN. It simply is an "automatically on" VPN (IPSec/L2TP). 
Your performance will be the same as any other VPN of that type.

Using DA is completely seamless to the end-user (for exported resources).

Configuring DA for Win7 on Server 2008R2 is quite doable. But very very 
persnickety. Both for the client and the server gateway. Debug information, in 
case you run into a problem, is pretty minimal.

Using DA on Windows 8 (and above) is trivial. Configuring DA on Server 2012 and 
above is very easy. Debug information is quite helpful and seriously improved.

While I would be happy for you to hire me, if you follow the documentation, you 
shouldn't have any problems with Win8.1 and above; and Server 2012R2 and above.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Melvin Backus
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] DirectAccess

I'm very interested in responses to this as well.  I'm considering a project to 
implement this.  I have a few additional questions if I may.

Are your client machines running Win7 or Win8.x?
If you are only running 8.x, did you have / create a CA in place or use the 
Kerberos proxy functionality?
For any of you who looked at this and decided not to do it and went another 
way, why and what solution did you pick instead?

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
         those who understand binary and those who don't.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kish n Kepi
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 7:31 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NTSysADM] DirectAccess

I would like to hear from people who have implemented DirectAccess on Windows 
Server 2012 R2.


1.       Did you do it yourself or hire a consultant

2.       Was it difficult, or time-consuming to deploy the solution

3.       To how many computers did you deploy

4.       Does it work seamlessly as advertised

5.       Is throughput same, faster or slower than conventional VPN?

Any other questions I'm not knowledgeable enough to ask?

Kish

Reply via email to