Oops I inverted it - should read *3.3 *times the power density of the SLA.
SteveS wrote:
, so it has a power density 0.3 times the SLA.
Oops I inverted it - should read *3.3 *times the power density of the SLA.
SteveS wrote:
, so it has a power density 0.3 times the SLA.