Editors:

     Steve Mertl got almost half of his facts right on GM's EV1.

http://www.canada.com/topics/technology/story.html?id=f304fa64-dd86-
4db4-a6ad-9776d5ee4f20&k=33398&p=1

     He wrote of GM's: "...aborted US$1.5-billion effort to market the 
EV1 in the 1990s... Only about 100 of the battery-powered two-seat 
commuter cars were delivered into drivers' hands in Arizona and 
California test markets despite heavily subsidized leases. 
...experts who point to the EV1's well-known problems, including 
limited range, especially if the heat or air conditioning was turned 
on and its impracticality in power-sapping cold-weather regions. 
The car's lead-acid batteries themselves had evolved little since the 
days of the Ford Model T."

    Not one of these "facts" is correct. GM claimed that it spent 
US$1B altogether on the EV1, about what the automaker spent at the 
time in redesigning an existing model. GM may be including the cost of 
its Federal lawsuit to avoid mass-producing the car (that was also EV1-
related spending.) GM's actual cost of developing an electric vehicle 
(EV) from the ground up and building 1150 EV1s has been estimated at 
US$350M. 

     Next, all 800+ EV1s offered were leased (GM never sold EV1s,) 
with waiting lists in the several thousands. Every EV1 offered to 
individuals was leased; years later, enthusiasts offered over ten 
million dollars to buy 77 EV1s that GM had sequestered in Burbank, 
California. GM refused the US$10M: in early 2005, EV advocates held a 
24-hour EV1 Vigil for a month outside the GM Burbank lot; two Vigilers 
were finally arrested for blocking transporters loaded with EV1s bound 
for the crusher. GM hunted down and crushed over a thousand EV1s: this 
is all public record. Mr. Mertl did not check his "facts."

     EV1 drivers reported no problems with their cars; they accepted 
the original 50- to 75-mile range (as did thousands more would-be 
lessees, who never got to drive an EV1.) Heating and air-conditioning 
affected its range only slightly. Cold weather may have affected the 
500 original, 1996 lead-acid EV1s, but the 650 Gen II 1999 EV1s, with 
nickel-metal hydride batteries, had no such weakness and would propel 
the car over 125 miles on a charge. Both EV1 builds took an 80% charge 
in two hours.

     The automotive and oil industries spent more than GM did (in 
building EV1s) on anti-EV ads, planted op-eds, wildly 
inaccurate "research" sponsorship and publication, 
lobbying, "protests" by befuddled senior citizens bussed in with the 
promise of a free meal and T-shirt, a lawsuit to gut the California 
ZEV mandate and legal bills for efforts to stall EV mandates in a 
dozen other US states.

     Your reporter should know, as we do, to look up and verify, if GM 
tells you that the sky is blue.


Breathe free, 
                   Hugh E Webber 
Florida Chapter, Electric Auto Association    www.eaaev.org
       Earth Shuttle Pedalcab:   www.pedalcab.us

Breathe free, 
                   Hugh E Webber 
Florida Chapter, Electric Auto Association    www.eaaev.org
       Earth Shuttle Pedalcab:   www.pedalcab.us


_______________________________________________
FLEAA Mailing List
[email protected]
http://www.floridaeaa.org

Reply via email to