And then there's the potential tax credits:
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13746_7-10047679-48.html


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Clark
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 6:55 PM
To: listserv
Subject: [FLEAA] bye bye volt

from
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/fresh-greens/2008/09/17/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-chevy-volt.html

Reports suggest the Volt can make it through the EPA test cycle-which from
2008 includes high-speed running, air-conditioning load, and cold-start
tests in addition to the city and highway cycles-with the
internal-combustion engine running about 15% of the time.
The straightforward calculation gives the Volt an EPA fuel-consumption
rating somewhere north of 100 mpg. But the EPA apparently wants to certify
the Volt differently, insisting it finishes the test with the batteries
close to full charge. *That drops the calculated fuel consumption to just
under 48 mpg*, because the internal-combustion engine would have to be run
essentially all the time to keep the batteries near full charge.



as soon as that gets wide reports that will be the immediate downfall of the
demand for the volt. There will be many that will be able to beat that but
that will be the number one excuse by everyone putting down electric
cars....
_______________________________________________
Florida EAA mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.floridaeaa.org

_______________________________________________
Florida EAA mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.floridaeaa.org

Reply via email to